Report an error   


Submitted: 16 May 2007 Modified: 12 April 2018
HERDIN Record #: PCHRDPC040654

Comparison of an alternative electrocautery apparatus with a commercially available electrocautery unit in terms of immediate coagulative ability and extent of tissue injury.

1Deogracias Alberto G. Reyes,
2Christopher Galang,
3Joseph Tabora,
4Edgardo R. Cortez
Department of Surgery - St. Luke's Medical Center

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: An electrocautery unit is an invaluable piece of equipment in most operating rooms. It not only shortens operating time, but also reduces blood loss, avoiding unnecessary blood transfusion. However, the availability of these units remains to be a problem in smaller hospitals especially outside the metropolis due to its cost.
OBJECTIVES: This study compared an alternative cautery apparatus with a commercially available cautery unit in terms of hemostatic ability and extent of tissue damage.
METHODS: The study was a controlled trial using healthy rabbit subjects of comparable age (7-8 weeks old) and. body mass (450-550 grams).Stratified random sampling was carried out on the subjects. Hemostatic ability of each test apparatus was evaluated by measuring the amount of time to coagulate transected mesenteric arteries of rabbit subjects. Coagulative necrosis was quantified by measuring the depth and diameter of tissue injury to the peritoneum of rabbit subjects after application of each test apparatus.Observations undcrwent statistical analysis using repeated measures ANOVA with level of significance set at p<0.05.
RESULTS:The alternative cautery apparatus had a mean of 14.533 seconds versus 11.300 seconds for the commercial apparatus to achieve hemostasis. The study showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the alternative cautery apparatus and the commercial cautery unit in time to achieve hemostasis with a p value of 0.345. As for the depth of tissue damage, the alternative apparatus had a mean of 0.314 micrometers vcrs us that of 0.377 micrometers for the commercial unit. There was no statistically significant difference with a p value of 0.431. As for diameter of tissue injury, the alternative apparatus had a mean of 4.420 micrometers versus 2.347 micrometers for the commercial unit. A significant difference was noted in the diameter of tissue injury at a p value of 0.002.
CONCLUSIONS: Results showed that the alternative cautery apparatus was as effective as the commercial equivalent and could be a meaningful instrument in thc clinical setting.

1.
Publication Type:
Journal
Publication Sub Type:
Journal Article, Original
Title:
Philippine Journal of Surgical Specialties
Frequency:
Quarterly
Publication Date:
January-March 2003
Volume:
58
Issue:
1
Page(s):
27-30
Publisher:
Philippine College of Surgeons

LocationCall NumberAvailable FormatAvailability
Philippine Council for Health Research and Development Library Box No. 6 Fulltext pdf (Request Document)
1. Concise Medical Dictionary Oxford University Press: Market House Books, 1998.
2. Lantis, J. C., Durville, F. M., Connolly, , et al., . "Comparison of coagulation modalities in surgery" J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 8(6): 381-394, 1998 - [External Link]
3. Bieber, E. J., Redwine, D. B., Tucker, R. D., et al., . "An in-vivo evaluation of the correlation between histologic and sisually estimated zones of tissue injury created with monopolar electrosurgery" J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1((4, Part 2): S3-4, 1994
4. Lee, J. Y., Ebel, H. , Balogh, A. , et al., . "Comparison of new automatically controlled electrocoagulator (Valleylab NS 2000-Instant Response technology) with a high frequency coagulator" Minim Invasive Neurosurg 42(4): 212-215, 1999 - [External Link]
5. Sachs, M. , Sudermenn, H. . "History of surgical instruments: 7. The first electrosurgical instruments: Galvanic cauterization and electric cutting snare" Zentralbl Chir 123(8): 950-954, 1998 - [External Link]
6. OConnor, J. L., Bloom, D. A.. "William T. Bovie and electrosurgery" Surgery 119(4): 390-396, 1996 - [External Link]
7. Abstein, G. T.. "Practical electrosurgery for clinicians" Professional Medical Education Association Inc. , 1999
8. 1998 National Population Census National Statistics Office, 1998.
9. Riedel, H. H., Stamer, U. , Mecke, H. . "Methods of electron microscopy studies of the uterine horn of the New Zealand rabbit following use of four different coagulation methods" Zentralbl Gynakol 109(22): 1345-1349, 1987 - [External Link]
10. Schemmel, M. , Haefner, H. K., Selvaggi, S. M.. "Comparison of the ultrasonic scalpel to CO2 laser and elcetrosurgery in terms of tissue injury and adhesion formation in a rabbit model" Fertil Steril 67(2): 382-386, 1997 - [External Link]
11. Armstrong, D. N., Ambrose, W. L., Schertzer, , et al., . "Harmonic scalpel vs. electrocautery hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective evaluation" Dis Col Rec 44(4): 558-564, 2001 - [External Link]